Review - Saints, Sinners, and Sovereign Citizens: The Endless War Over the West's Public Lands (John L. Smith)
I received an electronic copy of this book for free via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
I
have mixed feelings about this book. A three-star rating is not a bad
one; based on the definitions Goodreads gives, it means "I liked it."
And that's true; this book was an interesting introduction to the
legislative history of public lands in Nevada, and I came away with a
somewhat greater understanding of the sovereign citizens movement in the
rural West than I had before reading it (while I've occasionally
encountered sovereign citizen types here in Michigan, they are of a
somewhat different variety).
This book's greatest weakness is one
that I hope is merely a function of this being a pre-publication review
copy: the editing is distractingly bad. The same person's name might be
spelled two different ways on the same page; the same sentence will
appear, verbatim, in adjacent paragraphs. Years are frequently subject
to typos, such that at several points I had to rely on the rest of the
context to know whether something happened in the 19th century or in the
20th. I sincerely hope that these faults will be corrected before the
book's final publication date, and I would not have mentioned them at
all in the review if they had not been so pervasive and distracting.
Otherwise,
my chief complaint is that in its attempt to provide a broad overview
of the debate over federal public lands in Nevada (and to some extent
the West as a whole), the book sometimes seems to lose focus.
Fascinating and somewhat relevant as an extended digression into the
origins of the LDS church and the migration of Mormons to the Southwest
may be in understanding the Bundy family (and it is though the lens of
the Bundy family that the book begins and ends its look at the conflict
between the sovereign citizens movement and federal public land policy),
the book's historical narrative ultimately moves and forth through time
to an extent that makes it difficult for someone not particularly
familiar with Nevada history to keep a clear mental timeline of events.
Still,
it was an enjoyable and interesting book and I felt that I learned
quite a bit. If I were to read it a second time, I doubt I would go
through front-to-back but would instead approach it almost more as a
collection of essays on a shared theme by a single author.
Comments
Post a Comment