Skip to main content

Review - Saints, Sinners, and Sovereign Citizens: The Endless War Over the West's Public Lands (John L. Smith)

 53134392

 I received an electronic copy of this book for free via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.

I have mixed feelings about this book. A three-star rating is not a bad one; based on the definitions Goodreads gives, it means "I liked it." And that's true; this book was an interesting introduction to the legislative history of public lands in Nevada, and I came away with a somewhat greater understanding of the sovereign citizens movement in the rural West than I had before reading it (while I've occasionally encountered sovereign citizen types here in Michigan, they are of a somewhat different variety).

This book's greatest weakness is one that I hope is merely a function of this being a pre-publication review copy: the editing is distractingly bad. The same person's name might be spelled two different ways on the same page; the same sentence will appear, verbatim, in adjacent paragraphs. Years are frequently subject to typos, such that at several points I had to rely on the rest of the context to know whether something happened in the 19th century or in the 20th. I sincerely hope that these faults will be corrected before the book's final publication date, and I would not have mentioned them at all in the review if they had not been so pervasive and distracting.

Otherwise, my chief complaint is that in its attempt to provide a broad overview of the debate over federal public lands in Nevada (and to some extent the West as a whole), the book sometimes seems to lose focus. Fascinating and somewhat relevant as an extended digression into the origins of the LDS church and the migration of Mormons to the Southwest may be in understanding the Bundy family (and it is though the lens of the Bundy family that the book begins and ends its look at the conflict between the sovereign citizens movement and federal public land policy), the book's historical narrative ultimately moves and forth through time to an extent that makes it difficult for someone not particularly familiar with Nevada history to keep a clear mental timeline of events.

Still, it was an enjoyable and interesting book and I felt that I learned quite a bit. If I were to read it a second time, I doubt I would go through front-to-back but would instead approach it almost more as a collection of essays on a shared theme by a single author.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Collected Poems of Federico García Lorca, revised bilingual edition

I finished reading this anthology a few weeks ago, and apparently forgot to ever post a review. While García Lorca is one of the best-known Spanish poets, I was actually quite unfamiliar with his work before picking up this collection. Perhaps starting with an anthology of this size was jumping in off the deep end, but it was an enjoyable experience. Because this edition uses several different translators, there's a lot of variation even beyond what's inherent in the poems. Despite a very limited knowledge of Spanish, I found I enjoyed it being a dual language book--especially for sections where I didn't like some of the stylistic choices of the translations much and could then compare with the original. All in all, a very enjoyable collection of poetry.

Reading Challenges for 2021

 I usually do set a numerical goal on the Goodreads reading challenges each year, and find them to be a great way to feel some sense of accomplishment in reading [x] number of books in a given year. Since I also started reviewing some digital ARCs through NetGalley last year, I've been writing more reviews in general (though the non-ARC books I read I may or may not review). I've toyed with the idea of doing some additional challenges before, but haven't--so I'm going to try for it this year! Because this is my first time doing this, I tried to choose challenges that mesh pretty well with what I already tend to read. This means, basically, that they're challenges I could have done okay on with books I read naturally over the course of a year. Yeah, that might not quite be in the "move out of your comfort zone" spirit of many challenges, but it seems like a way to ease into it. So, without further ado, I'm going to be trying the following:   Rose City R...

Review - Mahagony

I received an electronic ARC of this book via NetGalley. This is not an easy book to assign a star rating. It's beautifully written--the language is poetic, and as the story and characters shift through time and perspective, the writing itself reflects this. This is a credit to both Glissant and to translator Betsy Wing. The book itself is not always pleasant--but that is part of the point. The narrative dips back and forth through time, and deals with themes of slavery, colonization, sexual exploitation, etc. in Martinique. The shifting narrators and time periods can become somewhat confusing to the reader, and I think it is this more than anything else that made this relatively short book take me a fairly long time to read--that, along with the extended discussion of narrator vs. author toward the beginning of the novel. It was worth reading. It would be worth reading again, with a little more background on Glissant's other work and the history of Martinique, to...